ReviewMikrochimica acta2025
Fluorescence-based spectrometric and imaging methods and machine learning analyses for microbiota analysis.
Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Smartphone-based multispectral autofluorescence analysis of bacteria mixtures of staphylococci using convolutional neural network.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most microbiota determination (skin, gut, soil, etc.) are currently conducted in a laboratory using expensive equipment and lengthy procedures, including culture-dependent methods, nucleic acid amplifications (including quantitative PCR), DNA microarray, immunoassays, 16S rRNA sequencing, shotgun metagenomics, and sophisticated mass spectrometric methods. In situ and rapid analysis methods are desirable for fast turnaround time and low assay cost. Fluorescence identification of bacteria and their mixtures is emerging to meet this demand, thanks to the recent development in various machine learning methods. High-dimensional spectroscopic or microscopic imaging data can be obtained to identify the bacterial makeup and its implications for human health and the environment. For example, we can classify healthy versus non-healthy skin microbiome, inflammatory versus non-inflammatory gut microbiome, degraded versus non-degraded soil microbiome, etc. This tutorial summarizes the various machine-learning algorithms used in bacteria identification and microbiota determinations. It also summarizes the various fluorescence spectroscopic methods used to identify bacteria and their mixtures, including fluorescence lifetime spectroscopy, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), and synchronous fluorescence (SF) spectroscopy. Finally, various fluorescence microscopic imaging methods were summarized that have been used to identify bacteria and their mixtures, including epi-fluorescence microscopy, confocal microscopy, two-photon/multi-photon microscopy, and super-resolution imaging methods (STED, SIM, PALM, and STORM). Finally, it discusses how these methods can be applied to microbiota determinations, what can be demonstrated in the future, opportunities and challenges, and future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40323435What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.