ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Total-body
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kinetic modeling with total body PET-current status and future applications.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Brain-body interactions in systemic diseases: a survey from an imaging perspective.MedScience · 2026Review
- Advances in imaging-based diagnosis, prognosis, and response assessment in cardiac amyloidosis: a comprehensive multimodality review.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmyloidosis is a systemic disorder characterized by amyloid fibril deposition in multiple organs, including the heart, brain, liver, kidneys, and lungs, leading to organ dysfunction and affecting survival. In cardiac amyloidosis (CA), where the heart is primarily affected, the broader impact on other organs, particularly the brain, is not fully understood. This study aimed to assess the extent of amyloid deposition across systemic organs in CA, investigate brain-organ, brain-brain and organ-organ connections, and evaluate their effects on patients’ survival.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 70 patients, categorized into three groups by biopsy: cardiac amyloidosis (CA) (n = 31), non-cardiac amyloidosis (non-CA) (n = 12), and no amyloidosis control (NC) (n = 27). 11C-PIB PET/CT scans were performed, and standard uptake value mean (SUVmean) values were extracted using automated segmentation techniques. Brain-organ, brain-brain, organ-organ connectivity analyses were conducted using Spearman correlation. Survival outcomes and prognostic factors were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis.
resultsAmyloid deposition in CA patients was prominent in the myocardium, liver, and kidneys, reflected by increased SUVmean values. Significant brain-organ connectivity was observed, particularly between the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), parietal lobes, and myocardial amyloid burden. Additionally, CA patients demonstrated markedly stronger inter-organ connectivity, indicating systemic involvement. In contrast, Non-CA and NC patients demonstrated weaker brain-organ and inter-organ interactions. The CA group exhibited a higher mortality rate, highlighting the severe prognosis, particularly in systemic CA (SCA). Furthermore, elevated amyloid deposition in the bone marrow, lungs and spleen within SCA group was strongly associated with increased mortality.
conclusionIn CA patients, amyloidosis was associated with extensive systemic involvement, as shown by significant brain-organ and inter-organ connectivity patterns. Findings emphasize that cardiac amyloidosis substantially impacts survival, particularly when accompanied by amyloid deposition in the bone marrow, lungs, and spleen, indicating the need for a comprehensive diagnostic and management approach. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.