ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2025
[Articular and periarticular tumors : Important diagnoses in rheumatology and orthopedic rheumatology].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review article presents the histopathological differential diagnostics of malignant and benign joint tumors as well as pseudotumors of the joints and the peri-implant tissue. Methodologically, these integrative diagnostics are based on conventional standard staining procedures, on immunohistochemical analyses of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues and also on molecular diagnostic procedures, which can be particularly useful in the diagnosis of benign and malignant joint tumors. For joint tumors S100, smooth muscle (SM) actin, cluster of differentiation (CD) 68, CD34, signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 6, clusterin, mucin 4 (Muc-4), beta-catenin and mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are recommended. For the differential diagnostic typing of periarticular carcinoma metastases cytokeratin (CK, AE1/AE3), CK8, p63, thyroid transcription factor (TTF)-1, thyroglobin (TGB), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), androgen receptor, GATA, CD56, chromogranin, caudal type homeobox (CDX) 2, special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2), spalt like transcription factor 4 (SALL4), estrogen and progesterone receptors, CD45LCA, CD30, CD79a and S100 are recommended. Necrosis, pronounced inflammatory infiltration and reparative inflammatory changes can make histopathological classification difficult. Therefore, the correlation with clinical, microbiological and radiological imaging data may be necessary in the sense of interdisciplinary integrative diagnostics. In the case of histopathological findings that reveal questionable representativeness, the report should definitely refer to the need for clinical or radiological control as well as the need for a second biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40323421What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.