Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40323320›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025

Adoption of artificial intelligence in healthcare: survey of health system priorities, successes, and challenges.

Eric G Poon, Christy Harris Lemak, Juan C Rojas, Janet Guptill, David Classen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Clinical Primer on Computer Vision.Calcified tissue international · 2026
    Review
  3. SMART: structured, meaningful, auditable, responsible, and transparent documentation for clinical AI.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric G PoonDuke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7251-5842
Christy Harris LemakDepartment of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Juan C RojasRush University System for Health, Chicago, IL, United States.
Janet GuptillScottsdale Institute, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.
David ClassenDivision of Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.

Funding

Data Driven Strategies for Substance Misuse Identification in Hospitalized PatientsR01DA051464 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Majid Afshar · 2020 to 2026
$4.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA051464NIDA NIH HHS R01DA051464NIHRobert Wood Johnson Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe US healthcare system faces significant challenges, including clinician burnout, operational inefficiencies, and concerns about patient safety. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative AI, has the potential to address these challenges, but its adoption, effectiveness, and barriers to implementation are not well understood.

objectiveTo evaluate the current state of AI adoption in US healthcare systems, assess successes and barriers to implementation during the early generative AI era. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis cross-sectional survey was conducted in Fall 2024, and included 67 health systems members of the Scottsdale Institute, a collaborative of US non-profit healthcare organizations. Forty-three health systems completed the survey (64% response rate). Respondents provided data on the deployment status and perceived success of 37 AI use cases across 10 categories. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcomes were the extent of AI use case development, piloting, or deployment, the degree of reported success for AI use cases, and the most significant barriers to adoption.

resultsAcross the 43 responding health systems, AI adoption and perceptions of success varied significantly. Ambient Notes, a generative AI tool for clinical documentation, was the only use case with 100% of respondents reporting adoption activities, and 53% reported a high degree of success with using AI for Clinical Documentation. Imaging and radiology emerged as the most widely deployed clinical AI use case, with 90% of organizations reporting at least partial deployment, although successes with diagnostic use cases were limited. Similarly, many organizations have deployed AI for clinical risk stratification such as early sepsis detection, but only 38% report high success in this area. Immature AI tools were identified a significant barrier to adoption, cited by 77% of respondents, followed by financial concerns (47%) and regulatory uncertainty (40%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Ambient Notes is rapidly advancing in US healthcare systems and demonstrating early success. Other AI use cases show varying degrees of adoption and success, constrained by barriers such as immature AI tools, financial concerns, and regulatory uncertainty. Addressing these challenges through robust evaluations, shared strategies, and governance models will be essential to ensure effective integration and adoption of AI into healthcare practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDelivery of Health CareDiffusion of InnovationCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesAI safetyartificial intelligencegenerative AIresponsible AItechnology adoption

Identifiers

PMID40323320
PMCPMC12202002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.