Observational studyRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025
Trends in remission rates for rheumatoid arthritis in England and Wales: a population-level cohort study.
Observational study in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- First-line biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs versus methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of remission outcomes.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Comorbidity Profiles at Diagnosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis Versus Psoriatic Arthritis: A Nationwide Polish Claims-Based Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesConsiderable data support early treatment of RA to obtain disease remission. Data from the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit (NEIAA) in England and Wales suggest that, despite recent improvements in referral-to-treatment times, remission rates remain unchanged. We investigated reasons for this disconnect by evaluating temporal trends, geographical variation and predictors of remission in individuals with new RA diagnoses.
methodsAn observational cohort study of individuals with RA was conducted using data from NEIAA (May 2018-April 2024). Temporal and geographical variation in remission rates (DAS28 < 2.6) were explored using interrupted time-series and case-mix-adjusted mixed-effects regression. Predictors of remission were assessed using multivariable logistic regression.
results13 752 of 21 904 (62.8%) individuals with RA had data on DAS28 at 3 months after initial rheumatology assessment, of whom 4764 (34.6%) achieved remission. National remission rates were stable from 2018 to 2024; however, wide geographical variation was observed, ranging from 28.4% (London) to 40.3% (East of England). Threefold differences in remission rates were seen between individual hospitals within regions. Younger age, female sex, Black ethnicity, higher baseline DAS28, delayed DMARD initiation and longer symptom duration were independently associated with reduced odds of remission. Delays between symptom onset and referral have increased since the COVID-19 pandemic.
conclusionWhile national remission rates for early RA have remained stable in England and Wales since 2018, there is marked regional and hospital-level variation, highlighting ongoing inequities in service delivery. Addressing factors beyond referral-to-treatment time-particularly delayed presentation to primary care-is required to improve remission rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.