ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
High-Accuracy Digitization of Humphrey Visual Field Reports Using Convolutional Neural Networks.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Augmented Decisions: AI-Enhanced Accuracy in Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, necessitating precise visual field (VF) assessments for effective diagnosis and management. The ability to accurately digitize VF reports is critical for maximizing the utility of the data gathered from clinical evaluations. Methods: In response to the challenges associated with data accessibility in digitizing VF reports, we developed a lightweight convolutional neural network (CNN) framework. Using a decade-long dataset comprising 15,000 reports, we preprocessed portable document format files and standardized the extracted textual data into 48 × 48 pixel images. To enhance the model's generalization capabilities, we incorporated a variety of font types into the dataset. Results: The proposed CNN model achieved 100% accuracy in extracting numerical values and over 98.6% accuracy in metadata recognition. Post-processing correction using keyword mapping further improved metadata reliability, effectively addressing errors caused by visually similar characters. The model demonstrated superior efficiency compared to manual data entry, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining near-perfect accuracy. Conclusions: The findings highlight the effectiveness of our AI-driven digitization method in accurately interpreting Humphrey VF images. This advanced framework provides a reliable solution to digitizing complex visual field reports, thereby facilitating enhanced clinical workflows. Translational Relevance: The implications of this study extend to streamlined clinical workflows and AI-based report interpretation. By enabling comprehensive trend analysis of visual field changes, our model represents a significant advancement in glaucoma care, showcasing the transformative potential of AI-driven technologies in enhancing precision medicine and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.