Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40323288›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025

High-Accuracy Digitization of Humphrey Visual Field Reports Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Shian-Sen Shie, Wei-Wen Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shian-Sen ShieDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Chang Gung Memorial Hostpital, Linkou Branch, Taoyuan Taiwan; and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Wei-Wen SuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chansn Hospital, Zhongli, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, necessitating precise visual field (VF) assessments for effective diagnosis and management. The ability to accurately digitize VF reports is critical for maximizing the utility of the data gathered from clinical evaluations. Methods: In response to the challenges associated with data accessibility in digitizing VF reports, we developed a lightweight convolutional neural network (CNN) framework. Using a decade-long dataset comprising 15,000 reports, we preprocessed portable document format files and standardized the extracted textual data into 48 × 48 pixel images. To enhance the model's generalization capabilities, we incorporated a variety of font types into the dataset. Results: The proposed CNN model achieved 100% accuracy in extracting numerical values and over 98.6% accuracy in metadata recognition. Post-processing correction using keyword mapping further improved metadata reliability, effectively addressing errors caused by visually similar characters. The model demonstrated superior efficiency compared to manual data entry, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining near-perfect accuracy. Conclusions: The findings highlight the effectiveness of our AI-driven digitization method in accurately interpreting Humphrey VF images. This advanced framework provides a reliable solution to digitizing complex visual field reports, thereby facilitating enhanced clinical workflows. Translational Relevance: The implications of this study extend to streamlined clinical workflows and AI-based report interpretation. By enabling comprehensive trend analysis of visual field changes, our model represents a significant advancement in glaucoma care, showcasing the transformative potential of AI-driven technologies in enhancing precision medicine and improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

GlaucomaNeural Networks, ComputerVisual FieldsVisual Field TestsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID40323288
PMCPMC12060051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.