ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025
Predicting Maternal and Fetal Exposures of Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor during Pregnancy through Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pregnancy-related effect on elexacaftor, tezacaftor and ivacaftor pharmacokinetics in women with cystic fibrosis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Observational
- PBPK Models for Fetal Drug Exposure: A Critical Assessment of Current Approaches and Regulatory Readiness.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
- Developmental Programming of Drug Response: Microbiota as a Missing Dimension in Perinatal Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Prenatal Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor for Fetal Meconium Ileus: First Italian Case and Narrative Overview of the Emerging Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has been associated with increased fertility in women with cystic fibrosis (CF) and is increasingly used during pregnancy to support both maternal and fetal health. However, little is known about the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ETI during pregnancy, which is crucial for optimizing its efficacy and safety. This study aimed to predict the PK of ETI during pregnancy and to determine the maternal dose required to achieve therapeutic concentrations in both the maternal and fetus. The pregnancy physiological-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model within the Simcyp Simulator was used to predict the maternal and feto-placental exposure of ETI. Placental kinetics were parameterized using permeability parameters determined from the physicochemical properties of these compounds. The model closely predicted the observed data, with the observed ETI maternal plasma concentrations, cord concentrations, and infant plasma concentrations mostly falling within the range of predicted 5th to 95th percentiles. Steady-state simulations up to gestational week 40 predicted a continuous decline in ETI concentrations, with the AUC declining to 32.4-37.5% of baseline levels by week 40. However, the 5th percentile of trough concentrations for ETI consistently remained above the efficacy thresholds, both in mother and fetus. Therefore, it appears reasonable to maintain standard dosing regimen during pregnancy, complemented by careful monitoring. A clinical trial, such as the ongoing Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in the Era of Modulators (MAYFLOWERS) study, is required to further confirm the efficacy and safety of ETI in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.