ArticleArchives of endocrinology and metabolism2025
Awareness, treatment, and control of diabetes in South America: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Archives of endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Theaim of this review is to determine the proportion of awareness, treatment, and control of diabetes in the South American region. A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and LILACS databases from January 1, 2014, to March 23, 2024. We included observational, population-based studies that assessed the rates of awareness, treatment, and control of diabetes. The risk of bias was evaluated as proposed by Hoy and cols. A meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Additionally, a metaregression analysis was conducted to further explore heterogeneity. Fourteen studies met our eligibility criteria. The disease awareness meta-analysis, which included six studies, revealed that 71.7% (95% CI: 65.2%-77.8%, I2: 94.2%) of participants had a previous diagnosis of diabetes. The disease treatment meta-analysis, which included five studies, indicated that 64.6% (95% CI: 52.9%-75.3%, I2: 98.7%) of participants were receiving some form of treatment for diabetes, and 42.4% (95% CI: 36.0%-49.1%, I2: 96.3%) had their glycemic values within target ranges. All included studies were assessed to have a low risk of bias. In South America, the limited available evidence suggests a significant portion of individuals with diabetes remain untreated and uncontrolled. Numerous countries lack critical information on the diabetes care cascade necessary to inform health policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.