Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40323039›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2025

Differential Effects of Visual and Auditory Cognitive Tasks on Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements.

Geoffrey Kaye, Edan Johnston, Jaiden Burke, Natalie Gasson, Welber Marinovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Geoffrey KayeSchool of Population Health (Psychology), Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Edan JohnstonSchool of Population Health (Psychology), Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Jaiden BurkeSchool of Population Health (Psychology), Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Natalie GassonSchool of Population Health (Psychology), Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Welber MarinovicSchool of Population Health (Psychology), Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2472-7955

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) are important to gather visual information that guides our interactions with moving objects (e.g., tracking a tennis ball, or following a car when driving). In many neurological conditions, from Parkinson's disease to stroke, the voluntary control of SPEM can be compromised. Therefore, SPEMs can serve as sensitive proxies for assessing cognitive and sensorimotor function. Prior research has shown that SPEMs are influenced by attention and working memory load, yet it remains unclear how the sensory modality of concurrent tasks interacts with these effects. Here, we conducted a 3 (working memory load: no load, easy [low load], and hard [high load]) × 2 (sensory modality: visual vs. auditory) experiment to examine how working memory load and secondary task modality interact to affect SPEM in healthy young adults. Participants tracked a moving circle while simultaneously performing an arithmetic task, where they added either constant (1) or variable (1-5) numbers which were presented visually or auditorily. Our results showed that a secondary auditory task increased tracking variability during high cognitive load. In contrast, we found that the visual task improved tracking, reducing variability irrespective of cognitive load. We interpret our results as evidence that auditory processing requires additional top-down control that is critical for the control of smooth pursuit, diverting resources required for smooth pursuit and, consequently, increasing SPEM variability. These findings emphasize the importance of sensory modality in understanding the interactions between working memory and oculomotor control. We suggest that auditory secondary cognitive tasks may provide a more sensitive test of sensorimotor control deficits in future research with clinical populations.

Indexed as

AttentionAuditory PerceptionCognitionMemory, Short-TermPsychomotor PerformancePursuit, SmoothVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultattentioneye movementmotor controlsmooth pursuitworking memory

Identifiers

PMID40323039
PMCPMC12051362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.