Observational studyHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia2025
Real-World Unmet Needs of Patients With Haemophilia A and Haemophilia B With or Without Inhibitors: End-of-Study Results From the explorer6 Non-Interventional Study.
Observational study in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03741881 (A Prospective, Multi-national, Non-interventional Study in Haemophilia A and B Patients With or Without Inhibitors Treated According to Routine Clinical Treatment Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Multi-national, Non-interventional Study in Haemophilia A and B Patients With or Without Inhibitors Treated According to Routine Clinical Treatment Practice (Explorer™6)
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Real-World Unmet Needs of Patients With Haemophilia A and Haemophilia B With or Without Inhibitors: End-of-Study Results From the explorer6 Non-Interventional Study.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHaemophilia is associated with high disease and treatment burdens. Prospective evaluation of data from patients with haemophilia helps understand and define unmet needs, optimise treatment and improve healthcare outcomes.
aimTo present end-of-study data from explorer6 (NCT03741881), a prospective, non-interventional study across multiple countries in patients with haemophilia (haemophilia A or B without [HA or HB] or with inhibitors [HAwI or HBwI]).
methodsPatients ≥12 years old with severe HA, severe/moderate HB or HAwI/HBwI of any severity were treated according to the local standard of care (SoC). The number of bleeding episodes from enrolment up to a maximum of 115 weeks, physical activity based on data collected by a wrist-worn physical activity tracker, target joints and Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) measurements were assessed.
resultsA total of 231 patients across 33 countries were enrolled. The mean annualised bleeding rate (ABR) (standard deviation) for treated bleeding episodes was investigated for patients receiving prophylaxis (HA: 4.7 [5.9]; HB: 2.2 [3.0]; HAwI: 10.3 [8.5]; HBwI: 12.4 [14.1]) and those receiving on-demand (OnD) treatment (HA: 21.5 [17.7]; HB: 10.5 [8.6]; HAwI: 15.2 [14.8]; HBwI: 9.3 [13.3]). Physical activity levels were lowest among patients with HBwI. Target joints were similar among haemophilia types and treatments. Overall, mean and median HJHS total scores were lower for patients receiving prophylaxis compared with OnD treatment.
conclusionThe explorer6 study assessed a large haemophilia patient population in a real-world setting across 33 countries. The results indicate that an unmet need remains among patients receiving OnD treatment and those with inhibitors.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03741881.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.