Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40322999›Full record

ArticleJournal of biosciences2025

Identifying trials run in India, registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, is not straightforward.

Anwesha Dhal Samanta, Jaishree Mendiratta, Gayatri Saberwal

Abstract read
PubMed
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anwesha Dhal SamantaInstitute of Bioinformatics and Applied Biotechnology, Biotech Park, Electronic City Phase 1,Bengaluru, Karnataka 560100, India.
Jaishree Mendiratta
Gayatri Saberwal

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trial registries are invaluable resources for many stakeholders. However, these registries often require customized methodologies to identify studies of interest. To determine what steps it would take to catalog every trial that has run in India, in this study, we examined the records held by the registry of the United States, ClinicalTrials.gov. We utilized the Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov database, which draws data from ClinicalTrials.gov. Starting with 458,069 records, a shortlist of 11,439 records of interest was identified that contained the keywords 'India' or 'CTRI', the latter standing for Clinical Trials Registry-India. The

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDatabases, FactualRegistriesHumansIndiaUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40322999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.