ArticleNucleic acids research2025
WashU Epigenome Browser update 2025.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plotgardener App: a graphical interface for publication-ready genomic visualization.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Benchmarking genome choice in functional genomics analyses.Nature communications · 2026Article
- TaRGET II Data Portal: a multi-omics resource for environmental toxicant studies in mice.Nature communications · 2026Article
- An Integrated Single-Cell and Epigenomic Resource for Comparative Analysis of the Basal Ganglia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The 3D Genome Browser 2.0: an enhanced online platform for visualizing and analyzing 3D genome architecture.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Persistent Activation of Endothelial Cells is Linked to Thrombosis and Inflammation in Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The WashU Epigenome Browser (https://epigenomegateway.wustl.edu/) is a web-based tool for exploring genomic data and providing visualization, investigation, and analysis of epigenomic datasets. Since its 2018 update, the redesigned user interface and newly developed features have enhanced how investigators interact with both the Browser and the extensive genomic data it hosts. The rapid evolution of the JavaScript ecosystem has presented new challenges and opportunities in maintaining and developing the WashU Epigenome Browser. In this update, we present a completely rewritten codebase. This new codebase minimizes the use of external libraries whenever possible, resulting in a significantly smaller code bundle size after production compilation. The reduced code size improves loading efficiency and boosts the Browser's performance, with improved scripting, graphics rendering, and painting performance. Lowering external dependencies also allows for faster and more straightforward installation. Additionally, the update includes a redesign of the user interface to further enhance user experience and features a new modular design in the codebase that enables the Browser to be exported as stand-alone modules for use in other web applications. Several novel track types for long-read methylation data and single-cell methylation data visualization have been added, and we continue to update and expand the data hubs we host for major consortia. We constructed the first data hub to systematically compare genomic data mapped to different genome assemblies, focusing on comparisons between hg38 and the first human T2T genome, chm13, using our new comparative genomics track function. The WashU Epigenome Browser also serves as a foundation for other genomics platforms, such as the WashU Virus Genome Browser, developed for SARS-COV-2 research, the WashU Comparative Epigenome Browser, and the WashU Repeat Browser.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.