ArticleJournal of proteome research2025
Melanoma Proteomics Unveiled: Harmonizing Diverse Data Sets for Biomarker Discovery and Clinical Insights via MEL-PLOT.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using several melanoma proteomics data sets we created a single analysis platform that enables the discovery, knowledge build, and validation of diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic biomarkers at the protein level. Quantitative mass-spectrometry-based proteomic data was obtained from five independent cohorts, including 489 tissue samples from 394 patients with accompanying clinical metadata. We established an interactive R-based web platform that enables the comparison of protein levels across diverse cohorts, and supports correlation analysis between proteins and clinical metadata including survival outcomes. By comparing differential protein levels between metastatic, primary tumor, and nonmalignant samples in two of the cohorts, we identified 274 proteins showing significant differences among the sample types. Further analysis of these 274 proteins in lymph node metastatic samples from a third cohort revealed that 45 proteins exhibited a significant effect on patient survival. The three most significant proteins were HP (HR = 4.67, p = 2.8e-06), LGALS7 (HR = 3.83, p = 2.9e-05), and UBQLN1 (HR = 3.2, p = 4.8e-05). The user-friendly interactive web platform, accessible at https://www.tnmplot.com/melanoma, provides an interactive interface for the analysis of proteomic and clinical data. The MEL-PLOT platform, through its interactive capabilities, streamlines the creation of a comprehensive knowledge base, empowering hypothesis formulation and diligent monitoring of the most recent advancements in the domains of biomedical research and drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.