ArticleThe FEBS journal2025
Electrostatic potential as a reactivity scoring function in computer-assisted enzyme engineering.
Article in The FEBS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computationally guided enzyme engineering for regioselective synthesis of fucosylated human milk oligosaccharides.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The high catalytic efficiency of enzymes is attained, in part, by their capacity to stabilize electrostatically the transition state of the chemical reaction. High-throughput protocols for measuring this electrostatic contribution in computer-assisted enzyme design are limited. We present here an easy-to-compute metric that captures the electrostatic complementarity of the enzyme to the charge distribution of the substrate at the transition state. We demonstrate such a complementarity for a representative dataset of glycoside hydrolases, a large family of enzymes responsible for the hydrolytic cleavage of glycosidic bonds in oligosaccharides, polysaccharides, and glycoconjugates. We have implemented this metric in BindScan, a computer-based mutational analysis protocol to assist protein engineering. We demonstrate the predictive power of BindScan with this metric for two mechanistically distinct glycoside hydrolases: Spodoptera frugiperda β-glucosidase (Sfβgly, operates via protein nucleophile catalysis) and Bifidobacterium bifidum lacto-N-biosidase (BbLnbB, operates via substrate-assisted catalysis). The metric correctly predicts sequence positions sensible to the modulation of k
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.