ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Test-Retest Reliability and Responsiveness for the Simplified Chinese Lower Extremity Functional Scale in Patients With Lower Extremity Musculoskeletal Injuries.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for rating the single leg squat test.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Article
- Defining region and duration-specific substantial clinical benefit values for the simplified Chinese lower extremity functional scale.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- The Reliability and Validity of Star Performer™ a Computerized tool for Quantifying the Star Excursion Balance Test.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The simplified Chinese Lower Extremity Functional Scale (SC-LEFS) is a patient-reported outcome measure specifically developed for Chinese-speaking patients to assess functional status in those with lower extremity musculoskeletal disorders. However, to date, no studies have specifically examined the reliability and responsiveness of the SC-LEFS in nonarthritic musculoskeletal injuries. Purpose: To define the minimal detectable change (MDC) as a measure of test-retest reliability and the substantial clinical benefit (SCB) as a measure of responsiveness for the SC-LEFS in patients with nonarthritic lower extremity musculoskeletal injuries. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients aged between 18 and 50 years with a lower extremity musculoskeletal injury who were referred for physical therapy visits completed the SC-LEFS at the initial assessment and at the 4-week follow-up. Patients were classified into "stable,""improved," and "not improved" groups based on self-reported changes at the 4-week follow-up. The "stable" group was used to establish the MDC value for test-retest reliability. The "improved" and "not improved" groups were used to determine the SCB value for responsiveness. Results: A total of 763 patients (44.8% women), with a mean age of 32.9 (SD, 9.4) years, were included. Using the "stable" group (n = 40), excellent test-retest reliability was demonstrated with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.98 and an MDC of 5.1 points. To evaluate the responsiveness, the "improved" (n = 497) and "not improved" (n = 266) groups were analyzed. Receiver operator characteristic analysis found an SCB value of 9.5 points on the SC-LEFS. This change score could differentiate those "improved" from those "not improved" with a sensitivity of 0.68, specificity of 0.71, and area under the curve of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71-0.78). Conclusion: This study offers evidence of test-retest reliability and responsiveness with MDC and SCB values for the SC-LEFS in Chinese-speaking patients with nonarthritic lower musculoskeletal extremity injuries. Clinicians should consider 5.1 points as the measurement error and 9.5 points as the threshold for clinically meaningful improvement on the SC-LEFS in patients with lower extremity musculoskeletal injuries over a 4-week treatment period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.