ArticleJournal of ultrasonography2025
Point-of-care ultrasound: a viable alternative for assessing ulnar neuropathy in rheumatoid arthritis?
Article in Journal of ultrasonography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim of the study: This study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound measurements of the ulnar nerve cross-sectional area in comparison to electrodiagnostic tests for identifying ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow in rheumatoid arthritis. Patients and methods: This study was designed as a cross-sectional observational analysis involving 90 individuals, divided into three groups: Group A consisted of 30 individuals diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis without clinical signs of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow; Group B included 30 individuals with rheumatoid arthritis exhibiting clinical indicators of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow; and Group C comprised 30 healthy controls. Each participant underwent a thorough medical history assessment, along with both clinical and neurological evaluations. Additionally, ultrasound and electrophysiological assessments of the ulnar nerve were performed. Results: There was no significant demographic difference between the groups, except for age, which was notably lower in Group A compared to Group B. Additionally, abnormalities in nerve conduction studies and cross-sectional area were found to be significantly greater in Group B ( Conclusion: Ultrasonography exhibits high diagnostic accuracy, especially with the cross-sectional area at the medial epicondyle and the elbow-to-wrist cross-sectional area ratio serving as important indicators for ulnar nerve entrapment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.