Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40322705›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Effect of chitosan and chlorhexidine on demineraslised dentin to enhance adhesion.

Rashmi P Yadahalli, Saikiran Bahadur, Nisha Gupta, Smita Singh Bhardwaj, Sushree Arpita Priyadarsani, Ahmed Ali Ahmed Almuntashiri, Awadhesh Kumar Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rashmi P YadahalliDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, PMNM Dental College & Hospital, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India.
Saikiran BahadurDepartment of Prosthodontics, Springfield Dental, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA.
Nisha GuptaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, ESIC Dental College and Hospital, Delhi, India.
Smita Singh BhardwajDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah-11952, Saudi Arabia.
Sushree Arpita PriyadarsaniIntern, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Ahmed Ali Ahmed AlmuntashiriDepartment of Public health, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah, 51452, P.O. Box 6666, Saudi Arabia.
Awadhesh Kumar GuptaDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, DJ College of Dental Sciences and Research, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bond strength (BS) and failure status of demineralized dentin following the application of chitosan solution and chlorhexidine (CHX) is of interest to dentists. A total of 30 non-pathological extracted premolar teeth were subjected to caries induction through the pH cycle procedure. The teeth were divided equally into 3 groups as such as group I: control (distilled water), Group II-2.5% chitosan solution and Group III - chlorhexidine (CHX). Later teeth were subjected to a microtensile bond strength test (µTBS). The failure mode was assessed using stereo microscope. The bond strength of the chitosan-treated specimens was significantly higher than that of the chlorhexidine treated specimens and the control specimen which had the lowest bond strength.

Indexed as

Adhesionchitosanchlorhexidinedemineraliseddentininfection

Identifiers

PMID40322705
PMCPMC12044170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.