Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40322702›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Profilometric evaluation of root surface roughness using pumice and zirconium silicate polishing agents.

Devadharshini Chandrasekar, C Burnice Nalina Kumari, Nikita Ravi, Jaideep Mahendra, Vijayalakshmi Rajaram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Devadharshini ChandrasekarDepartment of Periodontics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
C Burnice Nalina KumariDepartment of Periodontics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Nikita RaviDepartment of Periodontics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Jaideep MahendraDepartment of Periodontics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vijayalakshmi RajaramDepartment of Periodontics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease that leads to tooth loss with dental plaque and calculus as key risk factors. Periodontal prophylaxis including polishing plays a crucial role in reducing plaque deposition and maintaining periodontal health. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the root surface roughness produced by pumice polishing powder and zirconium silicate prophylaxis paste using a profilometric analysis on the extracted teeth. The results show that zirconium silicate paste produced a smooth root surface compared to pumice powder which exhibited a rough texture. Thus, zirconium silicate paste is preferable for preserving root surface integrity during periodontal prophylaxis.

Indexed as

Periodontitisprofilometrypumice polishing powderroot surface roughnesstooth polishingzirconium silicate prophylaxis paste

Identifiers

PMID40322702
PMCPMC12044165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.