Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40322687›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Pathological predictors for curettage and cementation outcome in proximal tibial giant cell tumors.

Deepak Kumar, Ashish Kumar, Nilam Bhasker, Sanjeev Kumar, Atin Singhai, Priyank Pratap, Ankit Sriwastava, Madhusudan Mishra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Deepak KumarDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh-226003, India.
Ashish KumarDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh-226003, India.
Nilam BhaskerESIC Hospital, ESIC Hospital Complex, Sarojini Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh-226023, India.
Sanjeev KumarDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh-226003, India.
Atin SinghaiDepartment of Pathology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh-226003, India.
Priyank PratapDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh-226003, India.
Ankit SriwastavaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh-226003, India.
Madhusudan MishraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh-226003, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proximal tibia giant cell tumors (GCT) are aggressive with high-recurrence rate, function-affecting and benign neoplasms. Therefore, it is of interest to report the pathological predictors for curettage and cementation outcome in proximal tibial giant cell tumors. Hence, 32 patients treated with curettage, poly-methyl-methacrylate (PMMA) cementation and locking plate fixation between 2018 and 2022 was included in this study. The average age of patients was 28.1 ± 6.9 years and most tumors were Grade 2 (campanacci grade) with 62.5% cortical involvement. The average musculo-skeletal tumor society (MSTS) score was 27.2 ± 4.2 with acceptable function. Thus, tumor grade and cortical involvement were the main predictors of recurrence, reflecting the need for targeted treatment.

Indexed as

cortical bone involvement pathological predictorsfunctional outcomesGiant cell tumor (GCT)recurrence risktumor grading

Identifiers

PMID40322687
PMCPMC12044172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.