Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40322663›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025

Determinants of Successful Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Southeast China.

Ying-Ling Xiu, Bing-Qing Lv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ying-Ling XiuDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Fujian Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, 350000, People's Republic of China.
Bing-Qing LvDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Fujian Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, 350000, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to identify factors influencing the success of a trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC) and to evaluate associated maternal and neonatal outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from women with a prior cesarean section who underwent TOLAC at Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital in Southeast China between January 2016 and January 2018. Of the 1179 women who attempted TOLAC, 1038 achieved vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) while 141 experienced unsuccessful trials. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were compared between the successful and unsuccessful TOLAC groups using the Results: Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that maternal height (OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.05-1.14), abdominal circumference (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.91-0.98), ultrasound-estimated fetal weight (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.99-1.00), and history of vaginal delivery (OR = 9.62, 95% CI = 2.33-39.67) were independently associated with successful TOLAC. No significant differences were observed between the successful and unsuccessful TOLAC groups in terms of neonatal asphyxia, postpartum hemorrhage, placental abruption, or bladder injury. Conclusion: Maternal height, abdominal circumference, ultrasound-estimated fetal weight, and history of vaginal delivery were identified as influential factors for VBAC success. Clinical evaluation of these factors may enhance the selection criteria for TOLAC candidates, potentially increasing VBAC rates and reducing cesarean section rates overall.

Indexed as

pregnancy outcomeprior cesarean deliverytrial of labor after caesarean sectionvaginal birth after caesarean section

Identifiers

PMID40322663
PMCPMC12050019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.