ArticleJournal of cognition2025
Tracking the Effects of Eccentricity on the Integration of Orthographic Information From Multiple Words.
Article in Journal of cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of flanker size and flanker eccentricity on the spatial integration of orthographic information.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- On the spatial limits of parallel word processing in reading.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In adult readers, the perceptual span is approximately 14-15 characters to the right of the fixated word, corresponding to approximately 5° of visual angle. However, the extent of information processing within this area remains unclear. In the present study, we address this question using a novel adaptation of the flankers task in which the eccentricity of the flankers with respect to the central target word is increased. Fifty-four participants performed a lexical decision task on a central four-letter word flanked by two words of equal length. The flankers were either orthographically related (rock - rock) or unrelated (path - rock) to the target, and their eccentricity varied from 1.65° to 4.29° (center-to-center) in 0.33° steps. Participants' fixation was controlled by an eye-tracker using the fixation point as a trigger, and stimuli were displayed for 170 ms to avoid any eye movement. Results showed that the effect of unrelated flankers decreased with increasing eccentricity, while there was no effect of eccentricity of related flankers. In particular, the unrelated flankers affected central word processing up to the end of the parafovea. This observation provides evidence that the outer limits of the parafovea are engaged beyond prelexical processing. Lexical frequency influenced the magnitude of both reaction times (RTs) and accuracy rates, but did not interact with any variables. This novel adaptation of the flankers task has potential advantages for investigating the spatial integration of orthographic information across the perceptual span.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.