ReviewCureus2025
Breast Cancer Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks: A Deep Learning-Based Approach.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review of application of Artificial Intelligence in breast cancer detection and treatment.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Browser-Based Multi-Cancer Classification Framework Using Depthwise Separable Convolutions for Precision Diagnostics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer remains one of the leading causes of mortality among women, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where limited healthcare access and delayed diagnosis contribute to poor outcomes. Deep learning, especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs), has shown remarkable efficacy in breast cancer detection through automated image analysis, reducing reliance on manual interpretation. This study provides a comprehensive review of recent advancements in CNN-based breast cancer detection, evaluating deep learning architectures, feature extraction techniques, and optimization strategies. A comparative analysis of CNNs, recurrent neural networks (RNNs), and hybrid models highlights their strengths, limitations, and applicability in medical image classification. Using a dataset of 569 instances with 33 tumor morphology features, various deep learning architectures - including CNNs, long short-term memory networks (LSTMs), and multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) - were implemented, achieving classification accuracies between 89% and 98%. The study underscores the significance of data augmentation, transfer learning, and feature selection in improving model performance. Hybrid CNN-based models demonstrated superior predictive accuracy by capturing spatial and sequential dependencies within tumor feature sets. The findings support the potential of AI-driven breast cancer detection in clinical applications, reducing diagnostic errors and improving early detection rates. Future research should explore transformer-based models, federated learning, and explainable AI techniques to enhance interpretability, robustness, and generalization across diverse datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.