ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2025
Bilateral hand use during infancy in very low birth weight infants.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] To determine the age in months of bilateral hand use during the infancy period of preterm infants with birth weight <1,500 g. [Participants and Methods] This retrospective, observational study included 57 infants with no neurodevelopmental handicaps (average weight at birth 963.2 ± 298.2 g, gestational age 28.4 ± 3.1 weeks), who were transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit at a medical center in Japan between 2010 and 2014. The patients were classified into two groups based on weight at birth: 32 infants with birth weights <1,000 g (Group A) and 25 with birth weights between 1,000 and 1,499 g (Group B). Data on the ages at which bilateral hand use was attained ("playing with both hands together", "transferring a toy between the two hands", and "grasping two toys, one in each hand") were collected from the respective medical records and compared between the two groups. [Results] Significantly delayed bilateral hand use was detected in Group A compared to that in Group B for "transferring a toy between the two hands" (90th percentile, 7.2 months compared to 6.3 months). For the other two items, no differences were detected between the two groups. [Conclusion] The development of bilateral hand use during infancy differed among infants with very low birth weight and was delayed in the group with a lighter birth weight group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.