Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40322552›Full record

ArticleBiomedical reports2025

Inflammatory and pulmonary function characteristics of bronchial asthma induced by COVID‑19 infection.

Mingqiang Zhang, Lina Zhao, Pu Zeng, Xiangdong Mu, Jingquan Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mingqiang ZhangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 102218, P.R. China.
Lina ZhaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 102218, P.R. China.
Pu ZengDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 102218, P.R. China.
Xiangdong MuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 102218, P.R. China.
Jingquan ZhaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 102218, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bronchial asthma, a widely prevalent respiratory disease influencing individuals of all age groups worldwide, has been increasingly recognized as a global concern. While there exists a potentially heightened risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in asthmatic patients, particularly those with non-allergic asthma, it is uncertain whether COVID-19 infection-induced bronchial asthma has its own unique clinical characteristics. The present study aimed to compare and analyze the pulmonary function and eosinophilic inflammation indices of patients with COVID-19 infection-induced bronchial asthma and those with typical bronchial asthma, and further deepen the understanding of COVID-19 infection-induced bronchial asthma. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the pulmonary function and inflammatory characteristics of 116 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection-induced bronchial asthma and treated in outpatient clinics after March 2023, as well as 113 patients with typical bronchial asthma diagnosed and treated from January 2022 to November 2022. The main clinical characteristics were cough, sputum, chest tightness, dyspnea and wheezing. There was no significant difference in clinical characteristics between the two groups. The results indicated that there was no significant difference in the total IgE, the absolute value and percentage of eosinophil, transoral FeNO, and trans-nasal FeNO in the peripheral blood samples of patients in the COVID-19 infection-induced bronchial asthma group compared with the typical bronchial asthma group. Although there was no significant difference between the two groups in the rates of impairment in ventilation function, reserve function, and small airway function, significant differences were identified in various indicators, including forced expiratory volume in 1 sec as a percentage of the predicted value (FEV1%), residual volume/total lung capacity (RV/TLC), peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximal expiratory flow rate at 75% (MEF75), maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV), FEV * 30, and residual volume (RV) between the two groups. The findings indicated that patients with COVID-19 infection-induced bronchial asthma exhibited a comparatively inferior pulmonary function versus those with typical bronchial asthma. However, it is important to note that the clinical impact of this disparity was not statistically significant.

Indexed as

bronchial asthmaCOVID-19eosinophilFeNOpulmonary reserve functionsmall airway function

Identifiers

PMID40322552
PMCPMC12046281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.