Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40322543›Full record

ArticleDEN open2026

Effects of artificial intelligence assistance on endoscopist performance: Comparison of diagnostic performance in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma detection using video-based models.

Naoki Aoyama, Keiichiro Nakajo, Maasa Sasabe, Atsushi Inaba, Yuki Nakanishi, Hiroshi Seno, Tomonori Yano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DEN open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Naoki AoyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3978-2778
Keiichiro NakajoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.
Maasa SasabeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.
Atsushi InabaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7036-9485
Yuki NakanishiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan.
Hiroshi SenoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan.
Tomonori YanoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) detection is crucial. Although narrow-band imaging improves detection, its effectiveness is diminished by inexperienced endoscopists. The effects of artificial intelligence (AI) assistance on ESCC detection by endoscopists remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate an AI model for ESCC detection using endoscopic video analysis and evaluate diagnostic improvements. Methods: Endoscopic videos with and without ESCC lesions were collected from May 2020 to January 2022. The AI model trained on annotated videos and 18 endoscopists (eight experts, 10 non-experts) evaluated their diagnostic performance. After 4 weeks, the endoscopists re-evaluated the test data with AI assistance. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared between endoscopists with and without AI assistance. Results: Training data comprised 280 cases (140 with and 140 without lesions), and test data, 115 cases (52 with and 63 without lesions). In the test data, the median lesion size was 14.5 mm (range: 1-100 mm), with pathological depths ranging from high-grade intraepithelial to submucosal neoplasia. The model's sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 76.0%, 79.4%, and 77.2%, respectively. With AI assistance, endoscopist sensitivity (57.4% vs. 66.5%) and accuracy (68.6% vs. 75.9%) improved significantly, while specificity increased slightly (87.0% vs. 91.6%). Experts demonstrated substantial improvements in sensitivity (59.1% vs. 70.0%) and accuracy (72.1% vs. 79.3%). Non-expert accuracy increased significantly (65.8% vs. 73.3%), with slight improvements in sensitivity (56.1% vs. 63.7%) and specificity (81.9% vs. 89.2%). Conclusions: AI assistance enhances ESCC detection and improves endoscopists' diagnostic performance, regardless of experience.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceesophageal neoplasmsesophageal squamous cell carcinomagastrointestinal endoscopynarrow band imaging

Identifiers

PMID40322543
PMCPMC12046500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.