ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2025
Have the Power-Rate Capabilities of Skeletal Muscles Received the Attention They Deserve? A Historical Perspective.
Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This commentary addresses a consequential, core, rate factor in muscle contractions. In 1960, an isokinetic-loading dynamometer was invented to assess that rate. A 1978 muscle force and power-velocity study using it, showed that the power-rate capability of a muscle group can be determined - when a sufficient loading velocity and force-development time are provided. Newton's laws represent how existing forces can put yielding bodies in motion, thereby gaining mechanical energy, as well as how such forces first develop. Many of the ideas in this commentary are based on those laws of physics: a) all force developments in muscle contractions result from interactions of the mechanical energy - first converted from chemical energy within muscles' tiny contractile cells - with loading bodies encountered both within and outside muscles; b) the rate at which that mechanical energy is first generated, in turn determines the rate at which requisite, timely forces develop against submaximal, functional loads and c) the composite contractile power-rate attained by muscle groups, under conventional free-weight loading, may be significantly restricted by an unrecognized, acceleration-triggered, neural mechanism. Two other isokinetic-loading training devices were invented, which were designed to help people regain an ability to ambulate and/or improve their physical fitness - in both cases via suitably elevated muscle power-rates. The purpose of this commentary is to draw attention to muscles' functionally important, contractile power-rate capabilities, and to physical evidence of the ways they are apparently neurally restricted, so they can be reliably tested, and if found deficient, adequately improved, particularly by Sports PTs and ATCs. Level of Evidence: 5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.