ArticleThe open respiratory medicine journal2025
The Prevalence and Severity of Dyspnea in Young Saudi Female Adults: A Cross-sectional Study.
Article in The open respiratory medicine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychological Well-Being and Treatment Adherence in COPD Patients: A Correspondence Analysis of WHO-5, MARS, and GOLD Severity.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dyspnea impacts daily activities; women tend to report a higher perception of dyspnea and experience greater emotional distress compared to men. Therefore, the study aims to assess the prevalence and severity of dyspnea among Saudi women aged 18 to 35 years and explore associated risk factors. Method: A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted in Saudi Arabia. The data were collected using an electronic online questionnaire survey. The questionnaire consisted of participants' demographic data, and the status of factors associated with dyspnea, such as body mass index, physical activity, and smoking status. Using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale is another option. The modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale was used in a descriptive analysis to characterize the prevalence and score of dyspnea.A Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square tests were conducted to determine the differences and associations according to the dyspnea risk factors. A p-value of <0.05 determined the statistical significance. Results: A total of 554 participants were recruited. The overall prevalence of dyspnea was reported by 115 (21%) participants, with a mean score of 1.42 (SD 1.38) on the MRC Dyspnea Scale. The majority of participants were from the central region (74%) and aged 18 to 24 years (65.5%). No statistically significant differences were found between participants with and without dyspnea in terms of body mass index (22.6 [19.6-25.6] vs 22.8 [20.1-26.2], p=0.68, respectively), passive smoking status (p=0.07), or physical activity level (p=0.37). Conclusion: The study concludes that approximately one in five young females experienced dyspnea, suggesting that this symptom may be quite prevalent. However, no significant association was found between dyspnea and factors such as body mass index, passive smoking, or physical activity levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.