ArticlePerspectives in clinical research
Study on antifungal usage in patients with vaginal itching and discharge at a private hospital in Kolkata using the National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Providers and the World Health Organization prescribing criteria.
Article in Perspectives in clinical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: One in every 10 women presents with abnormal vaginal discharge in Gynaecology and Obstetrics Department, with the most common cause being candidiasis. Irrational use of antifungal for treatment of this condition leads to antifungal resistance and increase morbidity. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Pharmacology in collaboration of Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the private medical college hospital in Kolkata. One hundred and forty outpatient department prescriptions were screened and included in this study from March 2024 to April 2024, and the prescriptions of the previous 6 months were collected. Results: The average number of drugs per prescription was 1.1. Antifungals were prescribed in 89.3%, out of which only 8.6% were in accordance with the standard treatment guidelines of management of vaginal candidiasis. The dose of the drug was written in 11.5% of the prescriptions while the duration of treatment was written in 84.9% of the prescriptions. The fungal culture and sensitivity testing was documented in only 10.7% of the prescriptions. 29.5% of the prescriptions had the generic name of the medicines whereas the complete diagnosis was written in only 13.7% of the prescriptions. Conclusion: This study highlights the commonly encountered errors in prescribing of antifungal drugs in a tertiary care teaching hospital. These errors may lead to irrational prescribing of antifungal and development of antifungal resistance in the long run. Active surveillance in the form of regular prescription audit and organizing regular training workshop for the prescribers will improve the prescribing practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.