ArticleCureus2025
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block vs. Wound Infiltration for the Reduction of Postoperative Patient-Controlled Analgesia Requirements Following Laparoscopic Hemicolectomy: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks and wound infiltration are commonly used regional analgesic techniques in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. However, their comparative efficacy remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate whether TAP blocks reduce postoperative morphine consumption and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) duration compared to wound infiltration following laparoscopic hemicolectomy. Methods We conducted a retrospective case-control study comparing postoperative opioid requirements and PCA duration in patients who received TAP blocks versus wound infiltration for laparoscopic hemicolectomy. Landmark vs ultrasound-guided TAP block techniques were also compared. The primary outcome was total postoperative morphine consumption via PCA, and the secondary outcome was PCA duration. Data on postoperative adjunct analgesia and patient demographics were also collected. Results Comparing TAP blocks (n=59) and wound infiltration (n=33), no significant difference was found between groups in postoperative morphine consumption via PCA (p=0.111), PCA duration (p=0.092), or average daily morphine requirement via PCA (p=0.452). Comparing ultrasound-guided (n=21) and landmark (n=38) TAP block techniques also yielded no significant difference between groups for each of these dependent variables. Variability in opioid use was high, with large standard deviations observed in all groups. Discussion TAP blocks did not demonstrate a significant opioid-sparing effect compared to wound infiltration following laparoscopic hemicolectomy. These findings contribute to a growing body of literature with conflicting evidence on the efficacy of TAP blocks. However, TAP blocks may offer benefits beyond postoperative opioid-sparing effects. Further prospective studies incorporating postoperative pain scores and recovery metrics are needed to determine their clinical utility in multimodal analgesia protocols for colorectal surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.