Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40322405›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Reducing the Morbidity Associated With Incorrect Pediatric Tracheostomy Tube Placement: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Alisha R Pershad, Maria Peña, Habib Zalzal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alisha R PershadSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, USA.
Maria PeñaDivision of Otolaryngology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, USA.
Habib ZalzalDivision of Otolaryngology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite an increase in pediatric patients being discharged with a tracheostomy tube (TT), morbidity and mortality rates remain considerable. The aim of this quality improvement (QI) project is to reduce the proportion of tracheostomy documentation errors per 1000 tracheostomy patients by 50% or more, and sustain this for six months.

methodsUsing the Model for Improvement and a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle, a key driver diagram (KDD) identified challenges in accessing accurate TT information within the electronic medical record (EMR). EMR representatives created an alert for any patient with a TT diagnosis code to provide immediate access to tracheostomy information. Assessment of this intervention was conducted using descriptive statistics and QI control charts.

resultsPrior to intervention, an average of 56 different tracheostomy patients per year were evaluated, and 15 events were recorded. Upon implementation of the alert, there was one safety event in the 180-day pilot period. Since the initial PDSA cycle, there have been two TT documentation events, improving the average from one error in every 40 patients seen over a 28-month period to one error in every 137 patients seen over a 24-month period (and counting).

conclusionIncreased access to accurate TT information in the EMR demonstrated an increased interval between events. Future work includes routinely tracking events as a new metric to follow and implementing other interventions from the KDD for a multi-interventional approach to the global aim. We recommend that organizations implement this straightforward approach to dramatically reduce untoward outcomes with catastrophic potential.

Indexed as

pediatric airwaypediatric otolaryngologyquality improvementtracheostomy caretracheostomy tube

Identifiers

PMID40322405
PMCPMC12048109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.