Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40322397›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Uterus-Preserving Management of Intractable Haemorrhage Following Suction and Evacuation: A Case Series.

Ritu Singh, Poonam Lal, Swaroop R Nanda, Monika Gupta, Avinash K Singh

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ritu SinghObstetrics and Gynaecology, Kurji Holy Family Hospital, Patna, IND.
Poonam LalObstetrics and Gynaecology, Kurji Holy Family Hospital, Patna, IND.
Swaroop R NandaObstetrics and Gynaecology, Kurji Holy Family Hospital, Patna, IND.
Monika GuptaObstetrics and Gynaecology, Kurji Holy Family Hospital, Patna, IND.
Avinash K SinghRadiodiagnosis, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Patna, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suction and evacuation (S&E) is a very common procedure in obstetric patients with minimal blood loss. Although rare, in cases of secondary postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) due to retained products of conception (RPOC) following delivery (vaginal or caesarean section) and in hydatidiform mole, there is a chance of intractable haemorrhage, following S&E, which may require a hysterectomy. Hysterectomies not only lead to premature menopause but also increase overall morbidity and risk of mortality to the patient. The objective of this study is to highlight the occurrence of intractable haemorrhage following S&E in cases of secondary PPH and molar pregnancies and to evaluate uterine-preserving surgical techniques as effective alternatives to hysterectomy. We present three cases of intractable bleeding following S&E that were managed with conservative uterine preservation. The first case was a 26-year-old primipara presented with secondary PPH one month post-caesarean, requiring blood transfusion. Ultrasound revealed RPOC, and she underwent suction evacuation, but massive bleeding occurred. Suspecting uterine perforation, an exploratory laparotomy was performed, revealing a normal uterus. Bilateral uterine artery ligation successfully controlled the haemorrhage, preserving the uterus. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged on day 7. The second case was a 30-year-old female (Para 3, Live Births 2) with a history of two lower segment caesarean sections (LSCS), who presented with heavy postpartum bleeding 21 days after a preterm vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC). Ultrasound revealed RPOC, and she underwent S&E, but heavy bleeding persisted despite uterotonics. Laparoscopic bilateral uterine artery coagulation successfully controlled the bleeding, preserving the uterus. The patient recovered well and was discharged on postoperative day 3. In the third case, a 38-year-old female (Para 5, Live Births 3, Deaths 2) with a diagnosed molar pregnancy underwent S&E, during which she developed a massive haemorrhage. Despite medical management and uterine massage, the bleeding persisted. Laparoscopic uterine artery coagulation successfully controlled the haemorrhage, preserving the uterus. The patient received three units of packed red blood cells (PRBC), recovered well, and was discharged on postoperative day 3, with weekly monitoring until beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels normalized. For the conservation of the uterus, uterine artery ligation via laparotomy or laparoscopic coagulation of the uterine artery are both effective and safe procedures. In primigravida patients or those desiring future pregnancies, bilateral uterine artery ligation can be performed to save the uterus, either by laparotomy or laparoscopy, depending on the surgeon's expertise. Laparoscopy offers the added advantages of smaller incisions and a shorter hospital stay.

Indexed as

bipolar uterine artery coagulationintractable hemorrhagelaparoscopic management in pphlaparoscopymolar pregnancypregnancysecondary pphsuction evacuationuterine artery ligationuterus conservation

Identifiers

PMID40322397
PMCPMC12046872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.