ArticleCureus2025
Evaluation of 3D-Printed Models in Dental Education: Practical Applications and Student Perspectives.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of haptic virtual reality simulation training before clinical endodontic practice on student performance and perception.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Three-Dimensional Manufacturing of Mandibular Total Edentulous Simulation Model for In Vitro Studies-Concept and Validation.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecently, developments in digital technologies have significantly transformed dental education and practice. This study aims to assess students' knowledge and interest in digital dentistry and evaluate the implementation of 3D-printed models in dental training. A survey was conducted among 249 dental students to gauge their understanding of digital technologies, their willingness to deepen their knowledge, and their perceptions of advantages and limitations compared to conventional methods. MATERIALS AND
methodsFollowing the survey, 3D-printed dental models with removable dies were fabricated using high-resolution resin printing technology and distributed among first-year dental students. Over 13 weeks, students utilized these models for prosthetic training, performing procedures such as wax modeling, casting, and polishing of dental crowns. The study assessed the models' durability and categorized defects based on their location and cause.
resultsThe results revealed a high level of student interest in digital technologies, emphasizing the necessity of integrating modern tools into dental education. Statistical analysis of the defects in the 3D-printed models highlighted critical areas requiring improvement, particularly concerning mechanical handling. Additionally, correlation analyses of student responses indicated that those who perceive digital tools as beneficial for their future careers are more inclined to adopt them in practice.
conclusionsThe findings underscore the importance of digitalization in dental training, highlighting both its benefits and areas for refinement. Enhancing processing techniques and optimizing training methodologies can further improve the quality of 3D-printed models and their effectiveness in dental education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.