Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40322374›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Study on Acute Management of Colorectal Cancer Presenting as an Emergency.

Ajit Singh Oberoi, Paul A Peters, Neil Muscat, Imran Alam, Chelliah R Selvasekar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ajit Singh OberoiSurgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, GBR.
Paul A PetersGeneral Surgery, Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wigan, GBR.
Neil MuscatGeneral Surgery, Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wigan, GBR.
Imran AlamGeneral Surgery, Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wigan, GBR.
Chelliah R SelvasekarColorectal Surgery, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Many patients in Greater Manchester underwent emergency/urgent surgery, but limited data are available about managing these patients and their outcomes. We aimed to study the clinico-demographic profile, management trends, and outcomes of the patients presenting to the ED in the real world. Methods All patients with lower GI cancer (known or newly diagnosed on the present visit) in the ED requiring admission under surgeons for treatment were identified prospectively over six months and were included in the study. Results Nineteen patients were admitted (13 (69%) colon, 5 (26%) rectum, 1 (5%) anal cancer), with a median age of 67 years, and 10 (52.6%) were female. Ten (53%) patients were on the two-week wait pathway, and 14 (73.6%) patients presented with obstruction symptoms. Only 3 (15.7%) patients had received neoadjuvant therapy. Most had moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. All had CT of the abdomen on admission, with 9 (52.6%) having CT of the thorax. All had locally advanced or metastatic cancers. Twelve (63%) patients underwent surgery (6 (50%) definitive, 6 (50%) diversion stoma). Nine (75%) patients had early postoperative complications, and 6 (50%) required ICU admission. The median postoperative stay was 9.5 days, with a 30-day mortality rate of 25%. Conclusion This study provides a snapshot of the management and outcomes of patients presenting in emergencies. A further study at the regional/national level is needed to investigate the increasing emergency presentations of colorectal cancer (CRC) despite an established screening program.

Indexed as

colorectal cancercolorectal cancer surgeryemergency surgerypalliative medicinepalliative stenting

Identifiers

PMID40322374
PMCPMC12046193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.