Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40322367›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Dexmedetomidine Leads to Less Emergence Delirium Compared to Midazolam in Pediatric Tonsillectomy and/or Adenoidectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Pantea Jeizan, Kimia Baharimehr, Radin Kamvar, Asal Abolghasemi Fard, Seyedehhasti Zojaji, Amir Karimi, Ramin Zojaji

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Application of oral midazolam for preoperative sedation in pediatric tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy and its effects on emergence delirium.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pantea JeizanInternal Medicine, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Virginia, USA.
Kimia BaharimehrMedicine, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, USA.
Radin KamvarHospital Medicine, Albert Szent Gyorgy Health Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, HUN.
Asal Abolghasemi FardDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Modern Science and Technologies, Tehran Medical Science, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IRN.
Seyedehhasti ZojajiBiomedical Sciences, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, CAN.
Amir KarimiOrthopedic Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, USA.
Ramin ZojajiOtorhinolaryngology, Azad University, Tehran, IRN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tonsillectomy, with or without adenoidectomy, is a common pediatric surgical procedure that often induces significant preoperative anxiety, affecting both children and their parents. This anxiety can lead to aggressive behaviors, increased distress, and complicated postoperative pain management. Midazolam, often used for its rapid sedative effects, has drawbacks such as the potential for paradoxical reactions and respiratory depression. Alternatively, dexmedetomidine, known for its sedative, anxiolytic, and analgesic properties without significant respiratory depression, is becoming a favored option. The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in reducing anxiety, emergence delirium (ED), and postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing these procedures. A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar to identify studies from January 1, 2000, to March 1, 2025, comparing the effects of dexmedetomidine and midazolam in pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy. Eligible studies were selected following PRISMA guidelines, with a focus on outcomes related to sedation levels, ED, pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium (PAED) score, use of analgesics, and duration of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Data were analyzed using a random-effects model to accommodate inter-study variability. The meta-analysis included six studies with a total of 668 participants. Dexmedetomidine was associated with significantly lower rates of ED, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.43 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27-0.68, P < 0.01), and lower PAED scores compared to midazolam. Dexmedetomidine also demonstrated superior pain control, requiring less additional analgesia with an OR of 2.11 (95% CI: 1.42-3.12, P < 0.01). However, no significant differences were noted in anesthesia duration, extubation times, or PACU stays. Dexmedetomidine appears to be more effective than midazolam in reducing the incidence of ED and managing postoperative pain in children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy, without extending recovery times. These findings support the preferential use of dexmedetomidine for pediatric premedication in Tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy, potentially improving patient outcomes and satisfaction while maintaining cost-effectiveness in surgical settings.

Indexed as

dexmedetomidineemergence deliriummidazolampediatric anesthesiologypost-tonsillectomy bleeding

Identifiers

PMID40322367
PMCPMC12049695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.