ArticleCureus2025
A Comparison of Intercostal Nerve Block and Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntercostal nerve block (ICNB) plus intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) could be an alternative method of perioperative pain management in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). However, the efficacy of this strategy has not been established.
methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted at an acute care hospital in Japan. Among patients who underwent VATS under general anesthesia from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2022, we included those who received ICNB or thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA). The ICNB group had postoperative IV PCA, and the TEA group had postoperative epidural PCA. VATS indicated for pneumothorax or biopsy was excluded. The primary outcome was the maximum pain score measured by the numerical rating scale on postoperative day 1. Secondary outcomes included the times rescue analgesics were used and the use of antiemetics. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize bias from nonrandomized assignment of anesthesia methods.
resultsAmong 1,641 patients who met the criteria, 590 underwent ICNB and IV PCA, while 1,051 received TEA. After 1:1 propensity score-matching, 456 were in each group. The median (interquartile range) pain score on postoperative day 1 was higher in the ICNB group than in the TEA group, with values of 5 (4-7) vs. 3 (2-5) (p < 0.0001). Patients in the ICNB group more frequently used rescue analgesics on postoperative day 0, with values of 2 (1-2) vs. 1 (1-2) (p < 0.0001), and had a higher proportion of receiving antiemetics on postoperative day 1 (13.4% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.0004), compared to the patients in the TEA group.
conclusionsICNB plus IV PCA was inferior to TEA for postoperative pain management of VATS in the study population. Protocol-based prospective studies are needed to determine the efficacy of this strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.