ReviewCureus2025
Exploring the Current Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedic Surgical Training: A Systematic Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Smarter bones: AI & robotics revolutionise orthopedic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in orthopaedic education, training and research: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedic Education Across the Career Continuum: Moving from Benchmark Performance to Continuing Professional Development.Journal of CME · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in surgical education has been prominent, as evidenced by recent publications. Given the unique requirements and challenges associated with orthopaedic training, we conducted a systematic scoping review that examined the applications of AI only in this setting. A comprehensive search was conducted across four databases: Embase, CENTRAL, Medline, and Scopus. Original research articles that utilised an AI model within a specific orthopaedic educational context were considered for inclusion. Data from the included studies were extracted onto a bespoke form, followed by a thematic analysis to detect patterns within the data. Our findings were then summarised descriptively. A total of 21 studies were included in the scoping review, encompassing 273 participants. In relation to the integration of AI in orthopaedic surgical training, two overarching themes were identified: refinement of surgical competencies and enhancement of knowledge acquisition. All included studies, with the exception of one, were conducted in the last five years. Twelve distinct AI models were utilised across the included studies, with large language models accounting for over half the applications. Multiple promising interventions were highlighted, particularly the use of personalised automated feedback models for evaluating performance in surgical tasks. AI holds major potential to revolutionise orthopaedic surgical training. However, evidence supporting its use in this field remains limited. Further studies, preferably randomised controlled trials with larger sample sizes, are required to strengthen the evidence base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.