ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
A Diagnostic Stewardship Success: Implementing a Urine Culture Reflex Policy in the Emergency Department of a Large Safety-Net Hospital.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-Design of a Theory-Informed, Multicomponent, Intervention for Diagnostic Stewardship in a Major-Referral Emergency Department: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026Article
- Emergency department urine culture stewardship and downstream outcomes: a covariate-adjusted biweekly interrupted time series analysis.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Urinalyses and urine cultures (UCs) are frequently ordered simultaneously in emergency departments (EDs) to increase efficiency and decrease triaging times. However, this often comes at the cost of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of urinary tract infections. Our study examines the rates of UC orders and hospital savings after implementation of a reflex UC system in a large safety-net county hospital ED. Differences in rates of antibiotic use are also described. Methods: The electronic medical records of eligible patients were analyzed before and after implementation of a reflex UC ordering system, and rates of UC processing were documented to estimate savings to the hospital and the healthcare payer. As a secondary analysis, 7 days of medical records both before and after intervention were reviewed to describe absolute rates of antibiotic prescribing and adverse events attributed to antibiotics. Results: Data analysis of 9 months after initiation of a reflex UC protocol revealed a decrease in the average of monthly cultures processed by 20.3%, resulting in a hospital cost savings of $425 000 with savings to the healthcare payer on the order of $5 650 000 in prevented cultures alone. Secondary analysis revealed a small but not statistically significant decrease in the number of antibiotics prescribed after intervention (from 40.76% to 38.11%) with similar rates of adverse effects. Conclusions: Implementation of a reflex UC protocol in the ED of a large safety-net hospital resulted in a decrease of the number of cultures being processed, leading to substantial healthcare savings, which is particularly important in a resource-limited setting. While the implementation of the protocol resulted in cost savings due to diagnostic stewardship, the impact of such a protocol on antibiotic stewardship requires further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.