ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2025
Knowledge of and Attitudes Towards Standard Care in Patients with COPD.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The uphill journey of smoking cessation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: why a well-built vehicle matters.Frontiers in health services · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Health-related-quality-of-life is frequently reduced following intensive care treatment. Unwarranted or unwanted therapeutic interventions should be avoided at all costs. Since COPD patients are often faced with difficult decisions, an assessment was made of their desire for disease education. Our aim was to identify patients understanding of their disease and what their attitudes are towards different treatment options and whether this correlates to demographic factors. Methods: The COPD-Assessment-Test (CAT) was used to measure subjective disease burden. The COPD-Questionnaire (COPD-Q) was used to assess subjects' own knowledge of their disease. In addition, a specifically designed questionnaire was used to assess patient's subjective level of desire to be educated on COPD-specific topics. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify the demographic factors associated with a greater desire for disease-specific information. Results: 127 patients (67.2±8.8 years) were prospectively enrolled. Mean CAT score was 21.3±8.9 (95% CI:1-40). The desire for medical consultation was highly individual. In terms of vaccination, 31.5% of patients wished for more information while 34.6% wished for less. This also held true for information on long-term pharmacological therapy (29.1% vs 30.7%, respectively). Information on behaviour in case of emergencies as well as smoking cessation were wished for 38% and 42% of patients, respectively. Results of the COPD-Q showed that subjects were well-informed about specific topics (vaccination, etiology, emergency-inhaler) and less informed about long-term pharmacotherapy. In linear regression analyses, age (p=0.086), sex (p=0.906), education (p=0.833), health literacy (p=0.336) and burden of disease (p=0.296) did not influence patients´ desire for disease-specific information. Conclusion: Based on our cohort, COPD patients wish for more medical information related to behaviour in emergency situations and smoking cessation. The desire for education on disease-specific topics did not naturally correlate with demographic characteristics. The provision of medical information to patients remains a highly individualized and essential part of patient care. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00022109).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.