ArticleGastroenterology research2025
Procalcitonin as a Predictor of Mortality in Patients With Severe Acute Pancreatitis.
Article in Gastroenterology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Bar-Based Nomogram for Predicting Septic Shock in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis Complicated by Sepsis: Development and External Validation.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2026Article
- A Practical Guide to the Roles of Procalcitonin Measurement in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- PD-L1-stratified health-related quality of life in solid tumors: pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy-a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a severe inflammatory disorder that begins with the inappropriate activation of pancreatic enzymes within acinar cells due to biliary reflux, alcohol abuse, gallstones, and autoimmune disease. Several biomarkers have been studied that may aid in the early detection of pancreatic necrosis. The aim of this project was to evaluate the usefulness of procalcitonin (PCT) in predicting mortality in patients with severe AP in Mexican population. Methods: An observational study, including 59 patients diagnosed with AP from 2018 to 2023, was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Serum PCT levels were assessed on the first and third days of hospitalization (24 and 72 h). Results: A total of 59 patients were included, and the main etiologies were lithiasis (28 patients, 47.5%) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (nine patients, 15.3%). Of the total patients, 16 (27.1%) died during their hospital stay, and the main etiologies were septic shock of abdominal origin (10 patients, 62.5%) followed by extra-abdominal shock (six patients, 37.5%). The average PCT level was 4.54 ± 8.12 on the first day of hospital stay, and 5.20 ± 10.90 at 72 h. The cut-off point was 1.26 ng/mL with the best sensitivity and specificity of PCT as a predictor of mortality at 72 h of 75% and 68%, respectively (area under the curve 0.7, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61 - 0.88), and positive and negative predictive values of 0.46 and 0.87, respectively. Conclusions: We propose the usefulness of PCT as a biochemical marker to predict mortality in patients with severe AP due to its accessibility in the hospital environment. We propose to carry out studies with more patients and follow-up times. In addition, it is necessary to consider other biomarkers associated with PCT to help us improve the positive predictive value of mortality in this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.