ArticleTurk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi2024
[MSB-28] Treatment of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Long-Term Results of Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Versus Open Surgery.
Article in Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sudden deaths due to acute aortic wall failure: A 10-year forensic autopsy series.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) had a long-term survival benefit compared to open repair in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs). Methods: This retrospective study involved 58 patients (mean age: 69.6±10 years) who underwent either open surgery or EVAR for rAAA between January 2015 and June 2024. Results: Open surgery and EVAR groups were similar in terms of age. There were more male patients in the open surgery group. Intensive care unit and hospital stays were similar in both groups. The mean follow-up time was 41.2±40 months. The estimated cumulative survival rate in Kaplan-Meier analysis was %87.9 for the EVAR group and %40 for the open surgery group. Most of the deaths occurred in the first 30 days postoperatively. The reason for high mortality in open surgery was due to the hemodynamic status at arrival to the emergency service. Hemodynamically unstable patients usually had no time to wait for stent graft availability, and direct open surgery was required in these patients. A secondary factor that was important for successful treatment was the patient's anatomic convenience with EVAR treatment. Conversion to open surgery was approximately 40% due to the anatomy of the hostile neck and iliac vessels. Conclusion: An experienced team and a hybrid operation room with adequate equipment for optimal imaging and conversion to open surgery are essential for reducing mortality in rAAA. Mortality and morbidity with EVAR appear to be low compared to open surgical treatment in patients with rAAA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.