Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40322082›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Generative vocal plasticity in chimpanzees.

Adriano R Lameira, Bruno Caneco, Arik Kershenbaum, Guillermo Santamaría-Bonfil, Josep Call

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adriano R LameiraApeTank, Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Bruno CanecoDMP Statistical Solutions, St Andrews, UK.
Arik KershenbaumDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Guillermo Santamaría-BonfilData Portfolio Manager Department, BBVA Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Josep CallDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern theory posits that human-ape differences in voice command account for speech evolution. However, comparison has been indirect and conjectural based on vocal learning taxa far related from Hominids, instead of direct and quantitative based on great ape calls that, like all speech sounds, are local-specific and non-universal to the species. Moreover, the null hypothesis that the great ape voice command is purely reflexive has never been directly tested. Here, we show that in controlled, constant experimental settings, captive chimpanzees exhibit high-dimensional dexterity over voice activation and modulation in two atypical vowel-like calls. Subjects made unrestricted, multidimensional, and distinct voice changes within and between individuals, inducing parameter changes up to 10,000%, rejecting null hypothesis' predictions. Forecasting models indicated unmitigated voice novelty, altogether demonstrating emancipated and vast real-time voice control. Findings show that, contrary to traditional assumptions, speech and song evolution likely hinged on prolific voice command already available in ancestral ape-like ancestors.

Indexed as

Evolutionary biologyWildlife behaviorZoology

Identifiers

PMID40322082
PMCPMC12049825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.