ArticleiScience2025
Generative vocal plasticity in chimpanzees.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Twice times two: Dual mechanism for double rhythmic meter in orangutans and the evolution of human song.iScience · 2026Article
- Author Correction: Sociality predicts orangutan vocal phenotype.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- Investigating the role of the left inferior frontal gyrus in language evolution: insights from comparative neuroscience.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern theory posits that human-ape differences in voice command account for speech evolution. However, comparison has been indirect and conjectural based on vocal learning taxa far related from Hominids, instead of direct and quantitative based on great ape calls that, like all speech sounds, are local-specific and non-universal to the species. Moreover, the null hypothesis that the great ape voice command is purely reflexive has never been directly tested. Here, we show that in controlled, constant experimental settings, captive chimpanzees exhibit high-dimensional dexterity over voice activation and modulation in two atypical vowel-like calls. Subjects made unrestricted, multidimensional, and distinct voice changes within and between individuals, inducing parameter changes up to 10,000%, rejecting null hypothesis' predictions. Forecasting models indicated unmitigated voice novelty, altogether demonstrating emancipated and vast real-time voice control. Findings show that, contrary to traditional assumptions, speech and song evolution likely hinged on prolific voice command already available in ancestral ape-like ancestors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.