ArticleAJPM focus2025
Peer Education Initiatives for Promoting Adolescent Health in the South-East Asia Region: Findings From Desk Review and Key Informant Interviews.
Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of the study was to map the national-level peer education initiatives in the South-East Asia Region. Methods: This was a descriptive study design, employing primary methods (key informant interviews) and secondary data (desk reviews). Semistructured key informant interviews were conducted with Ministry of Health Officials and National Programme Officers of WHO Country Offices. Results: Almost all countries in the South-East Asia Region have national initiatives addressing adolescent issues and integrating peer education within them. The overarching goal of peer education initiatives was to enhance information dissemination and health services to adolescents. They shared key themes, including sexual and reproductive health, nutrition, mental health, substance misuse, noncommunicable diseases, communicable diseases, and life-skill education. Government-led models were prevalent over nongovernmental organizations-facilitated models. The Ministry of Health takes the lead in most countries, often collaborating with Ministries of Education, Youth and Sports. Peer educators' selection criteria included age, motivation, volunteerism, cultural awareness, communication skills, and educational qualifications. Resources, information, education, and communication materials varied in the form of pamphlets, posters, booklets, animated videos, and comic books. Supportive supervision was mostly provided by health workers or teachers, and incentives and reward mechanisms often relied on volunteerism. Reported barriers to successful program implementation included parental hesitancy, awareness gaps, lack of incentives, inadequate evaluations, and lack of capacity building. Facilitators included adolescent motivation, support from developmental partners, engagement of teachers and local leaders, and new-age media use. Conclusions: Peer education holds promise as an empowering approach to address crucial adolescent health issues; however, its implementation exhibits variations across South-East Asia Region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.