ArticleBiomedical optics express2025
Retinal reconstruction from peripheral biometry.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Visual and Physiological Optics: introduction to the joint feature issue inBiomedical optics express · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents a method for retinal reconstruction using peripheral biometry. The incident beam is presumed to be directed toward the center of curvature of the anterior cornea, reaching the retina with minimal deviation. A significant advancement is demonstrated by extending previous approaches to three dimensions and effectively capturing the complexity of astigmatic corneal surfaces. The method was evaluated in Zemax using Navarro's eye model featuring a retina of 12 mm radius, across various levels of accommodation ranging from 0 to 8 D, and a visual field angle between 25 and 25°. The method's reliability diminishes for field angles ≥ 35°. Validation was carried out using 500 synthetically generated eyes, and the method's performance was also assessed with an ellipsoidal retina. The findings revealed that spherical equivalent differences were consistently under 0.25 D at 25° for both types of retinas. Overall, these results demonstrate the method's effectiveness, offering a promising new tool for retinal reconstruction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.