ArticleBiomedical optics express2025
Joint estimation of point spread function and molecule positions in SMLM informed from multiple planes.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Aberration-aware 3D localization microscopy via self-supervised neural-physics learning.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of single molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) has transformed our capacity to investigate biological structures at the nanoscale. While the research focus has long been on improving localization precision, systematic errors caused by optical aberrations are often overlooked. In the case of 3D SMLM, such errors have the potential to significantly impair the quality of the resulting images. In this paper, we present an imaging and data processing approach that jointly estimates both, molecule positions and optical aberrations in SMLM. Therefore, the method minimizes systematic errors in SMLM reconstructions without the necessity of additional experimental calibration steps, such as the recording of fluorescent bead z-stacks. We investigate the reliability of this approach, especially in situations where the joint retrieval can be expected to be ill-posed, i.e., whenever the sample is "flat" and provides little diversity among the captured single molecule images. To enhance the reliability of the inverse problem solution, we suggest utilizing small SMLM data sets acquired at one or more slightly defocused "auxiliary" planes. We investigate the effectiveness of our approach through numerical simulations and imaging experiments of a calibration probe and nuclear pore complexes. Our method is simple and integrates seamlessly into existing SMLM setups without necessitating modifications or added complexity to the system.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.