ArticleBiomedical optics express2025
Experimental and modeling analysis of lenses with concentric cylindrical annular refractive elements: impact on peripheral imaging.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical evaluation of MyoCare in Europe (CEME) for myopia management: One-year results.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025Trial
- Spectacle lenses for control of myopia progression in children.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
- Effects of Myopia Control Spectacle Lenses on Peripheral Refraction and Contrast: Insights From Optical Modeling.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Real-World Effectiveness of CARE-Based Spectacle Lenses for Myopia Control in a Turkish Pediatric Cohort.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Shorter Viewing Distance Reduces Contrast in Man-Made Environments.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mechanism by which myopia-managing spectacle lenses slow myopia progression remains controversial. Understanding the changes these lenses introduce to peripheral imaging properties helps shed light on this controversial issue. Given the difficulty of directly measuring these changes in clinical settings, this study combined experimental and modeling approaches to evaluate changes in images at the retina induced by myopia-managing lenses. Optical characteristics that may related to the efficacy of the lenses with concentric cylindrical annular refractive elements (CARE) in myopia control were investigated. Three lenses were evaluated: MyoCare (MC), MyoCare S (MCS), and a single vision (SV) lens with a custom-built physical eye model and optical simulations for the analysis. The simulated PSFs are consistent with the measured ones. PSF analysis showed that MC and MCS lenses produce discrete curves, resulting in remarkable distortion in the simulated retina images, especially for large eccentricities. Whether they increase or decrease contrast depends on the spatial frequencies and eccentricities. These lenses also increase retinal light intensity at different eccentricities. The positive power of the CARE structure introduces myopic defocus of less than 0.25 D at only a limited range of eccentricities. The proposed approaches present relatively straightforward techniques for evaluating the optical performance of myopia-managing spectacle lenses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.