Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40321984›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2025

Experiences of discrimination across the life course among pregnancy planners in the United States and Canada.

Sharonda M Lovett, Lauren A Wise, Jasmine Abrams, Amelia K Wesselink, Erika L Sabbath, Ruth J Geller, Chad M Coleman, Andrea S Kuriyama, Molly N Hoffman, U Vivian Ukah and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sharonda M LovettDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Lauren A WiseDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Jasmine AbramsDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Amelia K WesselinkDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Erika L SabbathBoston College School of Social Work, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
Ruth J GellerDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Chad M ColemanDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Andrea S KuriyamaDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Molly N HoffmanDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
U Vivian UkahDepartment of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Renée Boynton-JarrettDivision of Health Services Research, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Collette N NcubeDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about discrimination among pregnancy planners. We used questionnaire data from Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO), a preconception cohort study, to characterize experiences, attributions, and responses to discrimination (n = 10,460). Eligible participants were assigned female at birth, aged 21-45 years, U.S. or Canadian residents, and not using contraception or fertility treatment. Participants completed a supplemental questionnaire (2013-2024) that included the Philadelphia Urban ACE Survey, Williams' Everyday Discrimination and Major Experiences of Discrimination scales, and Krieger's instrument on responses to discrimination. Mean age at enrollment was 30.9 years. Overall, 83.8 % of participants identified as non-Hispanic White, and 50.4 % had ≥17 years education. Discrimination across the life course varied: 11 % of participants reported childhood racial discrimination, 80.3 % reported ever experiencing everyday discrimination, and 47.2 % reported ever experiencing lifetime discrimination. The most prevalent types of everyday discrimination included being perceived as not smart (63.4 %) and being treated with disrespect (62.6 %), while job-related discrimination was the most frequently-reported lifetime experience (33.9 %). Most Black participants (non-Hispanic and Hispanic) reported their race or ethnicity as one of the main reasons they were discriminated against (87.7 % and 80 %, respectively), while sex or gender was most commonly-reported by other racial and ethnic groups (range: 75.9-82.4 %). Most participants responded passively to discrimination: keeping it to themselves and accepting it as a fact of life (37.4 %). All participants other than non-Hispanic White reported greater exposure to discrimination across the life course, and attributions for discrimination (

Indexed as

DiscriminationHealth equityPreconceptionSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID40321984
PMCPMC12047613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.