ReviewTzu chi medical journal
Dietary supplementation roles in concussion management: A systematic review.
Review in Tzu chi medical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Concussion, one of the most common types of mild traumatic brain injury, remains a global problem that poses substantial effects on individuals, families, and society. When dealing with concussion, clinicians primarily focus on symptomatic treatment and modified activity with no established therapies specifically addressing the underlying pathophysiological changes. In recent years, there has been a growing increase in attention to the effectiveness of dietary supplements (DS) and nutritional interventions as adjunctive therapy options for concussion. Hence, this review aims to comprehensively explore the existing human studies on using DS as adjunctive therapy in the management of concussion. This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The search strategy was created based on the population, intervention, comparison, outcome framework. The findings are conveyed narratively and analyzed according to the timing of the intervention. DS administered within 7 days of onset were classified as acute interventions, while those given after this period were classified as nonacute interventions. After screening, we identified 21 reports for 19 studies involving 13 DS. Thirteen DS were included in this review. Notably, omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids were the most extensively studied and accounted for 23.81% of studies, followed by melatonin and pine bark extract (19.05% and 9.5%). At least 13 supplements were identified in clinical studies, with 77% demonstrating favorable outcomes. However, none of the interventions reviewed offer strong enough evidence to justify regular use in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.