ArticleArXiv2025
An energy optimization method based on mixed-integer model and variational quantum computing algorithm for faster IMPT.
Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) offers superior dose conformity with reduced exposure to surrounding healthy tissues compared to conventional photon therapy. Improving IMPT delivery efficiency reduces motion-related uncertainties, enhances plan robustness, and benefits breath-hold techniques by shortening treatment time. Among various factors, energy switching time plays a critical role, making energy layer optimization (ELO) essential. This work develops an energy layer optimization method based on mixed integer model and variational quantum computing algorithm to enhance the efficiency of IMPT. The energy layer optimization problem is modeled as a mixed-integer program, where continuous variables optimize the dose distribution and binary variables indicate energy layer selection. To solve it, iterative convex relaxation decouples the dose-volume constraints, followed by the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) to separate mixed-variable optimization and the minimum monitor unit (MMU) constraint. The resulting beam intensity subproblem, subject to MMU, either admits a closed-form solution or is efficiently solvable via conjugate gradient. The binary subproblem is cast as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem, solvable using variational quantum computing algorithms. With nearly the same plan quality, the proposed method noticeable reduces the number of the used energies. For example, compared to conventional IMPT, QC can reduce the number of energy layers from 61 to 35 in HN case, from 56 to 35 in lung case, and from 59 to 32 to abdomen case. The reduced number of energies also results in fewer delivery time, e.g., the delivery time is reduced from 100.6, 232.0, 185.3 seconds to 90.7, 215.4, 154.0 seconds, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40321942PMC12047911What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.