ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
The Accuracy of Dynamic Parameters for Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Elderly Patients with Septic Shock.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Venous congestion from a vascular waterfall perspective: reframing congestion as a dynamic Starling resistor phenomenon.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Assessed the accuracy of stroke volume variation (SVV), pulse pressure variation (PPV), and dynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn) in predicting fluid responsiveness (FR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) response in elderly patients with septic shock. Patients and Methods: Mechanically ventilated patients aged over 65 with septic shock were enrolled. SVV, PPV, and Eadyn were recorded before and after FR testing (≥10% increase in cardiac output following a passive leg raise test or fluid challenge). MAP responsiveness was defined as a ≥10% increase in MAP post-fluid loading. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to assess predictive parameters such as PPV, SVV for fluid responsiveness, and Eadyn for MAP response after loading. Optimal cutoff values were determined using the Youden index. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. A p-value <0.05 indicated statistical significance. Results: The mean age was 76 ± 8 years. Of the 104 patients, 46 were FR-positive. PPV and SVV were higher in FR-positive patients (PPV: 22.07 ± 11.02 vs 9.34 ± 7.39, p < 0.001; SVV: 20 ± 11 vs 9 ± 6, p < 0.001). The AUC was 0.875 for PPV, 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.802-0.947, and 0.841 for SVV, 95% CI of 0.757 -0.925. Thresholds of 13.5% for PPV and 11.5% for SVV were found, with 81.8% sensitivity and 87% specificity. MAP responders had higher Eadyn (1.31 ± 0.54 vs 1.01 ± 0.93, p = 0.013). Eadyn showed an AUC of 0.844, with a threshold of 1.00 (sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 75%). Conclusion: PV, SVV, and Eadyn are predictors of FR and MAP responsiveness in elderly septic shock patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.