ArticleDigital health
Integrating expert knowledge with machine learning for AI-based stroke identifications and treatment systems.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feasibility and acceptability of Nenne Navi-AI: family-tailored intervention to improve sleep in young Japanese children.Frontiers in sleep · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide, requiring early detection and timely intervention to improve patient outcomes. However, in resource-limited locations, the lack of specialists often leads to delayed and inaccurate diagnoses. To address this, we propose an AI-driven stroke identification and treatment system that integrates expert knowledge with machine learning, enabling healthcare providers to make informed decisions without direct specialist input. The data for this study were obtained from Debre Berhan Referral Hospital through expert interviews, prescriptions, and from a public dataset in the Kaggle platform. Feature selection was performed using decision trees, Chi-Square tests, Elastic Net coefficients, and correlation analysis. Additionally, we applied to Shapley Additive Explanations to demonstrate the feasibility of feature selection in AI model development. Machine learning models, including Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine, were evaluated, and Random Forest classifier achieved the highest accuracy of 99.4% using k-fold cross-validation technique. Expert knowledge was encoded in Prolog, while machine learning models were implemented in Python to develop a hybrid expert system. Medical professionals evaluated the system, confirming its effectiveness as a decision-support tool for stroke diagnosis and treatment. This approach demonstrates the potential of AI-driven expert systems to enhance stroke management, particularly in regions with limited access to specialized care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.